Abortion kills PEOPLE not tissue. WARNING GRAPHIC IMAGES

Early this morning, Live Action Investigator and sidewalk counselor Gaby Federico discovered a dead, dismembered baby in the parking lot of Hilltop Family Planning Clinic, an abortion clinic in El Paso, TX. The Hilltop clinic advertises abortions up to 15 weeks.




Federico and a fellow pro-life sidewalk counselor at the clinic were alerted to the find by a man who lives next door to the clinic. He said the night before, his dog had been sniffing around the parking lot and found the baby’s body parts lying on the ground. The man placed the body parts in a plastic bag next to the clinic and alerted Federico this morning. At approximately 9:15 AM, Federico and others found disarticulated tissue, two bloody legs with feet, and a severed hand in the bag.



Police arrived at the clinic around 11:30 AM and are investigating and interviewing clinic staff. Abortion clinic staff have claimed the body is not “theirs” and that they “dispose of bodies properly.” The Bishop of El Paso, Armando Achoa, is also at the clinic and has asked for the body to for a funeral and burial.



Upon viewing photographs of the body parts, former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson said they were remarkably well-developed. “The findings are consistent with the remains of an abortion procedure,” confirmed Johnson, who at Planned Parenthood worked for years as a “products of conception technician,” the abortion industry’s term for someone who reassembles baby body parts after an abortion. “Based on the development of the foot and the formation of the leg, and what appears to be a tear at the top of the leg, this looks like an abortion done through vacuum aspiration on a child at 12 to 14 weeks LMP.”



Federico spoke to police this morning, who began an investigation at the clinic. The clinic denies responsibility and reportedly told police they “dispose of everything properly.” The Bishop of El Paso, Armando Ochoa, has requested permission to bury the remains.



“This is horrible to know that these children are killed daily here in El Paso, not only without a burial, but to be disposed of in such an inhuman way. It’s not fair,” expressed Federico. “This shouldn’t ever happen, in El Paso or anywhere. The world needs to see what abortion clinics do to children. When dead babies start turning up in the clinic parking lot, no further proof is needed of what abortion is. These clinics need to be shut down.”



Lila Rose, president of Live Action, called the find was shocking and sobering. “On Good Friday, millions of Americans contemplate the mystery of the suffering and death of Jesus Christ. It is a fitting time to remember that thousands of children every day suffer the violent death of abortion, while too many stand by out of indifference or ignorance.”



WARNING GRAPHIC IMAGES BELOW-

Anyone who can look at these pictures of perfectly formed tiny legs and feet and hands and say "abortion just removes a clump of tissue" is BLIND.

May YWHW God have mercy on us!

The Power of a Portrait

by Jennifer Rego on October 14th, 2010 at 11:54 pm

I recently came across the above photographs of a ten week old embryo on flickr, taken by an OB/GYN med student in India named Dr. Suparna Sinha, and I was struck by how beautiful they were. The mother had cancer of the womb, and her uterus, including her unborn baby inside, had to be removed. I can only imagine the pain that she must have felt losing this baby, having already been the mother of six children.
I made one of them my profile picture on Facebook, and the other day, one of my classmates from high school asked me why. I thought about it, and explained that I think that photographs of developing babies are one of the most powerful ways for people to realize the humanity of the unborn child.
I have been thinking about that though, and I think I missed the mark a little bit. It’s definitely true that they are powerful testimonies of the humanity of preborn children. But why?
I think photographs are powerful because it shows a real person, an individual, in one moment of time. These are remarkable photographs of what an unborn baby looks like at ten weeks, but it’s more than just an example of a fetus at a certain stage of development. They are also the photographs, the portraits, of a beautiful, unique, unrepeatable individual, who, sadly, did not live very long.
Photography is a medium that forges a unique connection, a relationship, between the observer and the one photographed, precisely it does not show an abstract idea, or a generalized model, but a real, and unique person, that if you had encountered in real life, would have been exactly the same. It is the same with photographs of babies in the womb, with photographs of babies killed in abortions, with the babies shown in the video HeresTheBlood…
Those are all powerful because you’re looking at a photograph of a real person, and in looking at them, you forge a relationship with them. The babies photographed after being killed in abortions are not simply examples of one collective, nameless, faceless injustice. They are unique individual persons that were each victims of a distinct injustices committed against them personally.
For myself, the power of the photograph is precisely that it is the reminder that I need that defending the unborn is not simply “a cause”, or an “issue”, because people are not causes or issue, they unique, unrepeatable human beings that I have a relationship with simply because we both share our human dignity, and it is simply because of that, that I have an obligation to defend them.

The Birth Control Pill Documentary

The Birth Control Pill Documentary from T Herbert on Vimeo.

A Christian worker, his family and a nurse friend investigate throughout North America to uncover the truth about the birth control pill. The debate has been raging for a decade and yet so few people know about it. How could this be? How does the pill really work? Can everyday oral contraceptives really cause abortions? Why are so many people uninformed?
Discover how this could be a deadly silence.
Find out what has shocked doctors and nurses.
Be informed! Inform others!
Visit us at 28daysonthepill.com

Risky Hormone Pills, Patches and Shots

Posted By Dr. Mercola | July 10 2010 | 31,910 views

By Dr. Mercola
The birth control pill was first introduced to the American public for contraceptive use in 1960. By 2002, 11.6 million US women were on “the Pill” according to CDC statistics^[1], making it the nation’s leading method of contraception.
Eighty percent of American women have used oral contraceptives at some point in their lives, according to a paper in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology^[2].
In my opinion, this is a tragedy as the Pills’ benefit of convenience is largely outweighed by their very serious health risks.
In fact, long-term use of oral contraceptives (OCs) will invariably increase a woman's risk of developing a serious chronic illness. Yet they are passed out like expensive candy at most physicians’ offices, with little regard for the known dangers.
The decision about which method of contraception to use can be overwhelming, and it seems that most women are not adequately informed of their options.
It is my intention to provide you with the information you need to make an informed choice.
First, I’ll review the general categories of birth control methods, then move on to the relative risks of each, and finally I’ll make suggestions about what I consider to be the safest and healthiest options.

Overview of Birth Control Methods

The most importantpoint to remember about birth control pills, as well as hormone patches or injections, is that they are potent synthetic hormones, whose adverse health effects have been well documented over the past 30 years^[3].
For instance, most doctors who see women about contraceptive concerns underestimate the effectiveness of natural family planning options and rarely or never mention them. Many women turn to birth control pills because they are not aware that there are safer options available.
The different contraception methods act in very different ways and can be broken down as follows:

• Barrier Methods: These work by physically preventing the sperm from reaching the egg. It includes male and female condoms, the diaphragm, and the cervical cap.
• Hormonal Methods: Typically, hormonal birth control methods work by releasing estrogen and progestin into your body, preventing your ovaries from releasing eggs. They also thicken cervical mucus, making it harder for sperm to enter the uterus. There are a wide variety of hormonal methods on the market including oral birth control pills, implants (Norplant), hormone shots like Depo-Provera, a vaginal ring called NuvaRing, and a contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra) worn on your skin.
  
• Spermicides: These are chemicals that kill or disable sperm so that it cannot fertilize an egg and cause pregnancy. Spermicides come in many different forms: foam, jelly, cream, film, and suppositories.
• Intrauterine Devices (IUDs): These are small, plastic, T-shaped sticks with a string attached to the end. The IUD is placed inside the uterus and prevents pregnancy by rendering the sperm unable to fertilize an egg, and by changing the lining of the uterus so that it is less supportive for an embryo.
• Natural Family Planning: In this method, a woman uses various techniques to determine when she is fertile during the month. Avoiding sexual intimacy, or using a backup method during the window of fertility can avert pregnancy. Techniques include the ovulation method, the symptothermal method (which is a combination of the ovulation method and monitoring of body temperature) and monitoring your saliva with the Ovu-Tech magnification lens.
  

What You are Risking by Using the Pill or the Patch

While many drugs do provide some benefit in certain situations, birth control pills are rarely, if ever, necessary. In exchange for the convenience of preventing pregnancy—which you can do naturally just as well—you are putting yourself at risk for a barrage of serious health problems, including:

Side effects of the Pill		Side effects of the Patch
Increased risk of breast cancer Increased risk of cervical cancer Blood clots High blood pressure Increased arterial plaque Cycle irregularities	Miscarriages Lower bone density Headaches Migraines Cramps, irregular bleeding Bloating Nausea Breast tenderness Vaginal infections Yeast overgrowth Gall bladder disease Depression/mood changes Loss of sexual function Impaired muscle gains	Raised risk of heart attack and stroke Irregular bleeding Problems wearing contact lenses Fluid retention or raised blood pressure Nausea	Headache Breast tenderness Mood changes Menstrual cramps Abdominal pain Skin irritation or rashes at site of patch

On top of this long list of major health concerns, birth control pills deplete your body of important nutrients, including:

• Vitamin B2
• Vitamin B6
• Vitamin B12
• Folic Acid
• Vitamin C
• Magnesium
• Zinc

If, for whatever reason, you chose to use birth control pills, you will at a minimum want to address the nutritional deficiencies they cause. Of course it would be best not to use them at all.
There is also a risk to any baby you might accidentally conceive while taking birth control pills.
Do you think you won’t get pregnant while using the Pill?
Statistically, this occurs about 5 percent of the time.
Many women become pregnant while on the pill and don’t know it for several weeks or months because the Pill makes them feel like they are already pregnant, so they miss the signs they would otherwise notice if they weren’t taking hormones.
Scientific studies show damage to the reproductive organs of baby mice whose mothers were exposed to low levels of estrogenic chemicals, and there is no way to know what the risks are for human babies.
Oral contraceptives can also make your baby more vulnerable to allergies when you take OCs for up to a year before becoming pregnant, according to a Finnish study.
Interestingly, there are even scientific studies suggesting that birth control pills may negatively influence your choice of romantic partner!
Research has shown that birth control pills may alter your menstrual cycle in such a way as to alter the sexual appetites of you and your partner, which could impact future generations. A few small studies have found a genetic difference between the men that women find attractive during a natural hormone cycle, and the men that women find attractive while under the influence of synthetic hormones.

Birth Control Pills Alter Secret Sex Nerve

Chemical contraceptives also appear to alter your “secret sex nerve (Nerve O),” which has endings in your nasal cavity and helps determine who floats your boat. The problem arises when you quit using the Pill, as suddenly the partner you chose while on it, no longer matches your instinctive drives.
Do you really want your romantic life dictated by a pill?
Birth control patches (Ortho Evra) have resulted in an avalanch of lawsuits over the past several years due to the overwhelming health problems women have experienced from using them. One of the reasons the patch is so risky is that you absorb up to 60 percent more synthetic estrogen than if you were taking an oral contraceptive.
Fortunately, demand for the patch has seriously declined as the warnings have escalated.

Hormonal Birth Control Risks Clearly Outweigh the Benefits

Because the risks of hormonal pills and patches are so high, and safer options exist, nearly all patients who visit my Natural Health Center are asked to stop hormonal contraceptives like birth control pills as soon as possible.
If you're using birth control pills for reasons other than birth control, such as to regulate your menstrual cycle or treat irregular bleeding, cysts, endometriosis, or even acne, you are not treating your underlying problem.
You are simply masking it with a potentially dangerous drug.
In these situations, it is essential to balance your adrenal glands, as cortisol levels modulate and control the female hormones—especially progesterone. The Pill merely treats your symptoms, not the underlying cause, which adds to your problem as your body struggles in its state of dis-ease.

Risks of Injectable Birth Control: Depo-Provera

Depo-Provera, or depo medroxyprogesterone (DMPA), is a progestin that interferes with hormone signaling to prevent your ovaries from releasing eggs.
A progestin is a synthetic chemical that mimics the progesterone your body makes but is far stronger and, as a result, carries with it a huge number of negative side effects.
A study in the May 2004 issue of the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology found that Depo-Provera users had declines in bone mineral density averaging 3 percent per year^[4]. Those on the shot for two years had losses in bone mineral density of roughly 6 percent, compared with a loss of 2.6 percent among women on birth control pills.
Comparatively, women using no hormonal contraceptives had, on average, a 2 percent increase in bone density during the same period.
In addition to significant bone loss, the Depo-Provera shot is associated with a long list of additional health problems:

Side effects of the Depo-Provera
Weight gain Headaches Breast swelling and tenderness Decreased sexual desire Depression Bloating Swelling of the hands and feet Nervousness Abdominal cramps Dizziness Weakness of fatigue Leg cramps Nausea Vaginal discharge or irritation	Backache Insomnia Acne Pelvic pain Lack of hair growth or excessive hair loss Rashes Hot flashes Joint pain Convulsions Jaundice Urinary tract infections Allergic reactions Fainting Paralysis Osteoporosis Increased diabetes risk	Lack of return to fertility Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolus Breast and cervical cancers Abnormal menstrual bleeding Increased risk for STDs Unexpected breast milk production Changes in speech, coordination, or vision Swelling of face, ankles or feet Mood changes Unusual fatigue

In short, Depo-Provera is a dangerous drug that should NEVER be used!
This hormone is so dangerous that, if you were to take it during the first stages of pregnancy, there is a high likelihood of spontaneous abortion.

Spermicides are Not Without Adverse Effects

Spermicides are essentially chemicals (usually nonoxynol-9 or N-9) that kill sperm by dissolving their outer membrane.
However, they also kill beneficial bacteria and skin cells. Disrupting the bacterial balance in your vagina can leave you more susceptible to yeast infections and urinary tract infections.
And it has been proven they add no additional protection to condoms.
According to a 2001 report from the World Health Organization, there is no evidence that condoms lubricated with nonoxynol-9 are any more effective in preventing pregnancy or infection than condoms lubricated with silicone.
Now, let’s look at some natural birth control alternatives that are both safe and effective.

Natural Birth Control Options

There are two routes to take when using natural birth control:

1. barrier methods, and
2. natural family planning methods

The two categories contain techniques that can be used in combination, since they work well together for different situations and circumstances. In general, people are a bit more familiar with barrier methods than with natural family planning methods, which are a little more complex.
However, if you become well versed in a variety of natural methods, your possibilities are expanded for a happy, fulfilling sex life with minimal interruptions.
After all, who wants to interrupt the “right moment” by having to stop and consult your reproductive owner’s manual?

Barrier Methods

As outlined earlier, barrier methods work by physically preventing the sperm from reaching the egg. The four barrier devices currently available are:

• Male condoms: Male condoms have a 98 percent effectiveness rate when used correctly. A water-based lubricant will increase the effectiveness; do not use an oil-based lubricant, however, as it will break down the latex.
• Female condoms: These thin, soft polyurethane pouches fitted inside the vagina before sex are 95 percent effective. Female condoms are less likely to tear than male condoms.
• Diaphragm: A diaphragm, which must be fitted by a doctor, covers your cervix (the entrance to your uterus), so that sperm cannot enter. They are used and removed each time you have intercourse. When used correctly with spermicidal jellies, they are 92 to 98 percent effective.
• Cervical cap: This heavy rubber cap fits tightly against the cervix and can be left in place for 48 hours. Like the diaphragm, a doctor must fit the cap. Proper fitting enhances the effectiveness above 91 percent.

Natural Family Planning Techniques

Again, these methods involve learning how to track your ovulation, and then avoiding sex or using a barrier method during that time.
Many women prefer the natural family planning methods because they feel empowered and more in touch with their own bodies as they learn to notice and track subtle signs of fertility and ovulation. Of course, these ovulation-tracking tools can also be helpful if you are actively trying to get pregnant!
Although natural family planning can be very effective, it is not always foolproof, especially when you’re still learning the process. I recommend that you learn your method from a reliable source, and use a backup (barrier) method until you have it down.
If preventing pregnancy is an absolute must for you, you may want to use barrier methods for extra insurance.
Some of the most popular family planning methods are:

1. The Calendar Method: Abstention from sex during the week the woman is ovulating. This technique works best when a woman's menstrual cycle is very regular. The calendar method doesn't work very well for couples who use it by itself (about a 75 percent success rate), but it can be effective when combined with the temperature and mucus methods described below.
2. The Temperature Method: This is a way to pinpoint the day of ovulation so that sex can be avoided for a few days before and after. It involves taking your basal body temperature (your temperature upon first waking) each morning with an accurate "basal" thermometer, and noting the rise in temperature that occurs after ovulation. Illness or lack of sleep can change your body temperature and make this method unreliable by itself, but when it is combined with the mucus method, it can be an accurate way of assessing fertility. The two methods combined have a success rate as high as 98 percent.
   
3. The Mucus Method: This involves tracking changes in the amount and texture of vaginal discharge, which reflect rising levels of estrogen in your body. For the first few days after your period, there is often no discharge, but there will be a cloudy, tacky mucus as estrogen starts to rise. When the discharge starts to increase in volume and becomes clear and stringy, ovulation is near. A return to the tacky, cloudy mucus or no discharge means that ovulation has passed.
4. Ovu-Tech Method: The Ovu-Tech^[5] is an inexpensive hand-held mini-magnification lens about the size and shape of a lipstick holder that allows you to monitor your saliva for hormonal changes that indicate fertility. Two natural methods I did not include in the above list because of their unreliability are the “withdrawal method” and the LAM. I will mention them for the sake of completeness, but please realize that they should be your last choice:
   
5. Withdrawal: The man withdraws his penis from the woman’s vagina before he ejaculates. This doesn't always work; even before ejaculation, the penis releases small amounts of semen that can contain sperm, so this is only 60 to 80 percent successful at preventing pregnancy.
6. Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM): Some experts claim that breastfeeding protects a woman from pregnancy by curbing hormones that trigger ovulation. However, every woman's body responds differently to the hormonal influences of breastfeeding, so this method is unreliable.

The Next Generation of Drug Based Birth Control

As expected, in 2007 the FDA approved the first birth control pill to completely eliminate menstruation (Lybrel, by Wyeth).
Not only was this pill inadequately tested prior to approval, the synthetic hormones it contains are another prescription for disaster for women’s health for all of the reasons already discussed.
But there is an additional concern—long-term suppression of your periods will minimize your blood loss and could contribute to iron overload syndromes that are so pervasive in men. Elevated iron stores are one of the primary risk factors for cancer and heart disease.
Is this where birth control technology is headed?
According to an article on Medicine.net^[6], in addition to pills that prevent menstrual periods, the next generation of birth control is marked by several trends, some of which are rather disturbing when you consider their physiological implications:

• A “Career Pill”: Canadian researchers are studying the possibility of a pill that will delay ovulation during your teens and 20s, resuming it when you are ready to have children.
• Male birth control pills: New hormone therapies for men, which have been unsuccessful in the past, are gaining steam; the next sperm-suppressing agents will also “protect against prostate and testicular cancer,” according to manufacturer claims. Of course, that’s what Wyeth said about Premarin—and look what that got us!
  In an effort to turn straw into gold, some researchers are working on a way to use phthalates in male birth control pills since they are known to depress testosterone levels and sperm counts.
  
• The “Dry Orgasm Pill”: Researchers are trying to develop a medication that capitalizes on a side effect of some existing blood pressure and schizophrenia medications—that is, freezing the muscle contractions that propel sperm through the male reproductive tract. Men would have a normal orgasm, sans sperm.
• Reversible Inhibition of Sperm Under Guidance (RISUG): Considered the most promising male contraceptive, a chemical is implanted or injected directly into the vas deferens, which renders the sperm unable to fertilize an egg. The effects of one injection can last for 10 years, and it’s reported to lack hormone-based side effects. It’s already in phase II clinical trials in India^[7].
• Spermicidal Creams: Future creams under development will not only kill sperm but will also kill STD-related pathogens, including HIV and herpes virus.
• Emergency birth control pills to stop conception after sex: Companies are attempting to gain “over the counter” status for “morning after pills.”
• Vaccines against pregnancy^[8]: Called immunocontraceptives, vaccines are being developed that affect fertility by regulating the body’s immune response. They would stimulate your immune system to shut down some of the functions necessary for pregnancy.

Sounds like playing with fire to me!

Recommendations for Further Reading

No matter how advanced medical technology becomes, disrupting the balance of your endocrine and immune systems is bound to result in untoward effects. This is true intuitively, as well as being borne out in history.
Therefore, you must use caution and common sense every time a new drug or device comes out that seduces you with glowing claims. When it sounds too good to be true, it usually is.
Your best birth control plan is the natural one, choosing family planning methods that have been around for decades (or thousands of years, in some cases).
As you transition over from synthetic hormones to natural methods of birth control, there are many resources available to guide you. Three great books to start with are:

1. The Ovulation Method: Natural Family Planning^[9], by John J. Billings
2. Taking Charge of Your Fertility: The Definitive Guide to Natural Birth Control, Pregnancy Achievement, and Reproductive Health^[10], by Toni Weschler
3. Honoring Our Cycles: A Natural Family Planning Workbook^[11], by Katie Singer

No matter which method of birth control you use, opting for one that does not involve hormonal manipulation of any kind will be one of the best moves you can make for your health.

---

• [1] Mosher W. D., Martinez G. M., Chandra A., Abma J. c., and Wilson S. J. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002” (December 10, 2004) CDC Division of Vital Statistics
• [2] Shufelt C. L. and Merz, C.N.B. “Contraceptive hormone use and cardiovascular disease,” J Am Coll Cardiol (2009) 53:221-231
• [3] Official Web Site for John R. Lee, M.D.
• [4] Berenson A.B., Breitkopf C.R., Grady J.J., Rickert V.I., and Thomas A. “Effects of hormonal contraception on bone mineral density after 24 months of use,” J Obstet Gynecol May 2004; 103(5 Pt 1):899-906
• [5] Ovu-tech website
• [6] Mann D. (2003) “The future of birth control,” Medicine.net
• [7] “India to market first male contraceptive injection in 2009” July 15, 2008 Thaindian News
• [8] “A vaccine against pregnancy?” Feminist Women’s Health Center (FWHC)
• [9] Billings, J.J. (1984) The Ovulation Method: Natural Family Planning, Liturgical Press, 5^th Ed.
• [10] Weschler T. (2006) Taking Charge of Your Fertility: The Definitive Guide to Natural Birth Control, Pregnancy Achievement, and Reproductive Health, Harper Paperbacks, 10^th Ed.
• [11] Singer K. (2006) Honoring Our Cycles: A Natural Family Planning Workbook, NewTrends Publishing

They Never Told Us That Our Birth Control May be Killing Our Pre-Born Children

Learn what doctors & government agencies have known for years about birth control but don’t disclose to women. edited by Darlene Folk
Director, Ashtabula Friends for Life

---

When Does Life Begin?

Life begins at fertilization (conception), that moment when a sperm joins with an ovum (egg) to form one cell called a zygote. The characteristics of this new person, such as sex, eye and hair color, intelligence, etc. are determined as he or she inherits 23 chromosomes from each parent at fertilization. This tiny child then travels down the Fallopian tube into the uterus. The new human implants herself in the rich lining of the uterus and begins to draw nourishment. This process takes approximately 5 to 10 days to complete. During this journey the miniscule child is often mistakenly referred to as a "fertilized egg", even by well-meaning pro-lifers. We must understand, however, that once the egg is fertilized it is no longer an egg, but a human being.
"Reproductive rights" advocates try to confuse the issue by redefining the fact of when life begins. They often propose that a pregnancy does not begin until implantation, not fertilization, and therefore they argue that many birth control methods we call abortifacient aren’t since they act before implantation, before life, they say, exists. But according to medical texts and agreed upon by medical professionals, "life begins at fertilization."

Contraceptives vs. Abortifacients

A distinction exists between contraceptive birth control and abortifacient birth control.

Contraception, n. prevention of conception. -- Webster's Dictionary

Contraceptives include the so-called barrier methods: the condom, diaphragm, cervical cap, and anti-sperm methods such as the sponge, jellies, foams and creams. These methods prevent sperm from fertilizing an egg. Abortifacients work after fertilization (conception) by killing the newly conceived human. These include oral contraceptives (the "Pill"), IUD, Norplant, Depo-Provera, Emergency Contraception (the "Morning-After Pill"), and anti-fertility vaccines. The U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare defined abortion as follows:

"All the measures which impair the viability of the zygote at any time between the instant of fertilization and the completing of labor constitute, in the strict sense, procedures for inducing abortion."¹
(emphasis added)

Although 1.6 million surgical abortions take place each year in the U.S., Dr. Bogomir Kuhar, a pharmacist concerned about chemical abortion, has calculated that in combining all forms of induced abortion -- the IUD, Depo-Provera, Norplant, surgical, and the Pill (and injectables, implants, and oral products that work in a similar fashion), between 9.6 and 13.4 million young lives are terminated in the U.S. alone each year.² Pro-abortion organizations readily admit the early abortion potential of these methods. In February 1992, writing in opposition to a Louisiana law banning abortion, Ruth Colker, a Tulane Law School professor, wrote,

"Because nearly all birth control devices, except the diaphragm and condom, operate between the time of conception ... and implantation ..., the statute would appear to ban most contraceptives (sic)."³

The "Pill"

The Pill is taken orally, usually every day. There are two kinds of Pills. The "combined Pill" contains both estrogen and progestin. The second type is a progestin-only Pill sometimes called the "mini-pill". Both kinds have three ways of working:

1. they prevent ovulation by suppressing the part of the brain which signals for ovulation to begin,
2. they change the lining of the cervix to make it more difficult for sperm to pass through, or
3. they prevent implantation of a newly conceived human life on the lining of the womb.⁴

Two other factors in a woman’s fertility may be affected by the Pill as well by:

4. lowering the efficiency with which the Fallopian tubes propel eggs or a newly conceived human (embryo) from the ovaries toward the uterus. This can cause the embryo not to reach the uterus in time to implant successfully.⁵
5. affecting the corpus luteum (a gland that controls the woman’s cycle and normally functions long enough to give an embryo time to implant and for the placenta to begin to support a pregnancy), causing it to allow the lining of the uterus to be shed before the embryo can successfully implant.⁶

The first two actions are contraceptive in nature; the last three cause abortions. Dr. J. Richard Crout, director of the Bureau of Drugs of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), concerning the "combination pills" has explained that,

"fundamentally, these pills take over the menstrual cyle from the normal endocrine mechanisms. And in so doing they inhibit ovulation and change the characteristics of the uterus so that it is not receptive to a fertilized egg (sic)".⁷

The action of the progestin-only Pill ("mini-pill") appears to be even more consistently abortifacient. When Syntex Laboratories, Inc. released the progestin-only Pill which it had developed, spokesman Russ Wilks announced that it did not

"interfere with ovulation ... It seems to affect the endometrium (the lining of the uterus) so that a fertilized egg (sic) cannot be implanted".⁸

The FDA’s detailed patient labeling for oral contraceptives (sic) says,

"progestin-only contraceptives (sic) are known to alter the cervical mucus, exert a progestinal (sic) effect on the endometrium, interfering with implantation, and, in some patients, suppress ovulation."⁹

Very conservative estimates state that the Pill kills pre-born children between 2 and 10% of the time.¹⁰ However, many medications and other external factors increase the abortion-causing nature of the Pill.¹¹ Also, since 1988, the amount of the contraceptive component of the Pill was lowered, which allows the abortion-causing component to come into play more often. It is estimated that some forms of the Pill of today cause abortions up to 50% of the time.¹² Emory University’s Contraceptive Technology published that the "mini-pills" allow ovulation to take place 40 to 60% of the time.

IUD

The IUD (intra-uterine device), is an object that is placed inside the uterus (womb) by a physician. When in place, it and the chemical it contains alters the fluids in the womb and the lining of the womb. The presence of the IUD irritates the lining, causing any newly conceived child to be unable to implant. The baby dies and passes out of the mother’s body unnoticed. According to the American Medical Association (AMA) Committee on Human Reproduction,

"the action of the ZUDs would seem to lie a simple local phenomenon. That these devices prevent nidation (implantation) of an already fertilized ovum (sic) has been accepted as the most likely mechanism of the action."¹³

In an exhaustive survey of over 400 articles on the subject, Dr. Thomas W. Hilgers concluded,

"... the condusion is that the primary action of the IUD must be classed as abortifacient." ¹⁴

Depo-Provera

Depo-Provera is a long-acting, man-made hormone in an injection received every three months. It has been available in some parts of the world for 20 years or more and has been used by doctors specifically to abort children. That is why Depo-Provera was not approved in the U.S. until recently. It has the usual progestin mechanisms of action (as the Pill): suppressing ovulation in some cases; altering the mucus in the cervix; or altering the endometrium, the lining of the uterus.¹⁵ Depo-Provera may cause abortions 40 to 60% of the time.¹⁶

Norplant

Norplant is also a progesterone drug which is becoming increasingly popular despite its significant risks and difficulty of removal. (As of August 1996, in Texas alone, over 68 federal lawsuits against its manufacturer, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, have been consolidated.) The drug is encased in 5 or 6 flexible capsules or rods, which are surgically implanted beneath the skin on the inside of the upper arm, and is designed to be effective for up to five years. Pregnancy is avoided through suppressed ovulation or aborted due to failed implantation of the baby. Studies show that it may cause abortions 50 to 65% of the time.¹⁷

Emergency Contraception (Morning-After Pill)

Emergency Contraception is one brand of the Pill. Preven is the only type approved by the FDA as of Spring, 1999. It is manufactured in higher dosages (up to eight times the normal dose), and packaged and marketed specifically for after-intercourse use. Preven is designed to be taken up to 72 hours after sexual intercourse and still be effective. Like all oral products, Preven can and does prevent implantation of an embryo and is therefore abortifacient.

Anti-Fertility Vaccines

Since the early 1970’s the World Health Organization has been funding research on a vaccine that would make a woman’s immune system attack and destroy her own babies in the womb. Two such vaccines being researched are the anti-hCG and the Trophoblastic Antigen (TBA) vaccines.

Alternatives

For the married couple, Natural Family Planning (NFP) provides a medically safe, healthy, highly effective and very low cost method of planning your family. For more information on NFP, contact The Couple to Couple League at (513) 471-2000. For the unmarried couple, abstinence is recommended.

References

1. Public Health Service leaflet no. 1066, U.S. Dept. of Health Education and Welfare, 1963, 27.
2. Lawrence Roberge, The Cost of Abortion. La Grange, GA: Four Winds, 1995, p 7.
3. Colker R (Feb. 6,1992). Louisiana abortion is a very real threat to women, The Dallas Morning News, 23A.
4. The Pill: How does it work? Is it safe?, Couple to Couple League Intl Inc (513)471-2000, (1993), pp 2-3.; and Ehmann, Dr. Rudolf, Abortifacient Contraception: the Pharmaceutical Holocaust, Human Life Intl., (540)635-7884, (1993), p 1.
5. Bronson RA (Sept 1981). Oral contraception: mechanism of action. Clin Ob Gyn 24 (3) 873-874.
6. Hatcher RA (1988) 192.
7. J. Richard Crout quoted in the FDA Consumer, HEW pub. no. 76-3024, reprinted from May, 1976.
8. Russ Wilks quoted in a United Press International release carried in the Cincinnati Post, Jan 11, 1973.
9. Federal Register, loc. cit.
10. Infant Homicides Through Contraceptives, 2nd ed., Eternal Life, (1994), p 1.
11. Ibid., p 2. Ehmann pp 16-17.
12. The Birth Control Game: Gambling With Life, American Life League / Pharmacists for Life, (866)538-5483, (1990), p 2.
13. American Medical Association Committee on Human Reproduction, "Evaluation of intrauterine contraception device", Journal of the Amercian Medical Assocation, 199:9, Feb. 27, 1967, p 155.
14. Thomas W Hilgers, "The intrauterine device: contraceptive or abortifacient?", Minnesota Medicine, June 1974, pp 493-581.
15. Bogomir Kuhar, Infant Homicides Through Contraceptives, Eternal Life Publishing (1995)
16. Ibid, p 28.

Can some forms of birth control cause abortions?

If you believe that life begins at conception and that abortion is murder, then please read this!

Many women today choose the convenience of chemical birth controls - either birth control pills, shots, or IUD's. But how do they work? The best way to find out is to read the Full Prescribing Information provided by the manufacturer. These can be obtained by looking on-line, checking Physicians' Desk Reference, or by asking your pharmacist. Once you have this, look under the heading "Clinical Pharmacology". This is where the manufacturer tells how the birth control works. Most chemical birth control methods have three mechanisms. Although the primary mechanism is inhibition of ovulation, other alterations include changes in the cervical mucus, which increase the difficulty of sperm entry into the uterus, and changes in the endometrium which reduce the likelihood of implantation.[1]It's that last phrase which should concern Christians. This means that a fertilized egg would be unlikely to be able to implant in the uterus. If life begins at conception, then this is an abortion.
[1]Physicians' Desk Reference (Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics, 1998)